Claim of Johnson v. Crosby-Brownlie, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Johnson v. Crosby-Brownlie, Inc.

211 A.D.2d 928, 621 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 252

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.D.2d 928 (Claim of Johnson v. Crosby-Brownlie, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Johnson v. Crosby-Brownlie, Inc., 211 A.D.2d 928, 621 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 21, 1993, which ruled that claimant did not establish a permanent disability to his back.

Claimant sustained a compensable back injury and was awarded workers’ compensation benefits. Subsequently, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found that claimant had no permanent disability and closed the case. The Board af[929]*929firmed and claimant appeals. Medical evidence presented to the Board indicated that claimant had no permanent disability to his back. Conflicting medical evidence merely presented a question of fact for the Board to resolve. Given that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision, we affirm.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 21, 1993, which ruled that claimant did not establish a permanent disability to his back.

Claimant sustained a compensable back injury and was awarded workers’ compensation benefits. Subsequently, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found that claimant had no permanent disability and closed the case. The Board af[929]*929firmed and claimant appeals. Medical evidence presented to the Board indicated that claimant had no permanent disability to his back. Conflicting medical evidence merely presented a question of fact for the Board to resolve. Given that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision, we affirm.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 928, 621 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-johnson-v-crosby-brownlie-inc-nyappdiv-1995.