Claim of Janiak v. Rubel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Janiak v. Rubel Corp.

245 A.D. 875

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The sole question here is one of wage rate. Claimant had been working for employer only three days when injured. The plant in which he worked operated only four months per year. The wage rate was based upon the payroll of another employee of the same class who had worked throughout the previous year for the same employer at another plant of the employer in the same city. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The sole question here is one of wage rate. Claimant had been working for employer only three days when injured. The plant in which he worked operated only four months per year. The wage rate was based upon the payroll of another employee of the same class who had worked throughout the previous year for the same employer at another plant of the employer in the same city. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Claim of Janiak v. Rubel Corp., 245 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

245 A.D. 875 (Claim of Janiak v. Rubel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related