Claim of Iovino v. Western Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Iovino v. Western Electric Co.

71 A.D.2d 717, 419 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.2d 717 (Claim of Iovino v. Western Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Iovino v. Western Electric Co., 71 A.D.2d 717, 419 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 24, 1978, which disallowed a claim for compensation benefits filed more than six and one-half years after the accident. The board found: "claim for compensation was not timely filed as provided under Section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.” The record supports the finding that payment of wages and medical insurance benefits under an employee benefit plan did not constitute advance payment of compensation to claimant. The decision of the board is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (Matter of Julian v New York Tel. Co., 64 AD2d 336; Matter of Rivard v New York State Police State Campus, 46 AD2d 34; Matter of Stewart v First Nat. City Bank of N. Y, 15 AD2d 622; Matter of Puglia v Sing Sing Prison, 9 AD2d 831). Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Main, J., not taking part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 24, 1978, which disallowed a claim for compensation benefits filed more than six and one-half years after the accident. The board found: "claim for compensation was not timely filed as provided under Section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.” The record supports the finding that payment of wages and medical insurance benefits under an employee benefit plan did not constitute advance payment of compensation to claimant. The decision of the board is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (Matter of Julian v New York Tel. Co., 64 AD2d 336; Matter of Rivard v New York State Police State Campus, 46 AD2d 34; Matter of Stewart v First Nat. City Bank of N. Y, 15 AD2d 622; Matter of Puglia v Sing Sing Prison, 9 AD2d 831). Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Main, J., not taking part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 717, 419 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-iovino-v-western-electric-co-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack