Claim of Ingram v. Gotham Originals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Ingram v. Gotham Originals

19 A.D.2d 924, 243 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2976

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 924 (Claim of Ingram v. Gotham Originals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Ingram v. Gotham Originals, 19 A.D.2d 924, 243 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

The board found, upon .conflicting evidence, that while carrying packages to an express office, claimant sustained compensable frostbite injuries resulting from an accident which occurred when he fell, was rendered unconscious and lay for some time in the snow. Appellants contend that the evidence in support of the claim is “ incredible ” and has .been “ refuted ” but the board was entitled to and did find otherwise. Appellants’ additional contentions are also without merit. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, J. P., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The board found, upon .conflicting evidence, that while carrying packages to an express office, claimant sustained compensable frostbite injuries resulting from an accident which occurred when he fell, was rendered unconscious and lay for some time in the snow. Appellants contend that the evidence in support of the claim is “ incredible ” and has .been “ refuted ” but the board was entitled to and did find otherwise. Appellants’ additional contentions are also without merit. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, J. P., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 924, 243 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ingram-v-gotham-originals-nyappdiv-1963.