Claim of Hyman v. V. I. Typewriters, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hyman v. V. I. Typewriters, Inc.

37 A.D.2d 895, 325 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3190

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 895 (Claim of Hyman v. V. I. Typewriters, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hyman v. V. I. Typewriters, Inc., 37 A.D.2d 895, 325 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 13,1970, in a heart ease. The record establishes that the decedent bad a severe cardiac condition prior to the fire on October 18, 1968, but there was medical testimony that as a result of the fire the decedent was “ thrown into a state of coronary insufficiency ” and that the long and arduous hours of employment, coupled with the psychological stress necessarily resulting from the fire, imposed upon the “ insufficiency ” caused his death. There is ample evidence of the decedent’s physical condition without considering the hearsay evidence as to pain and other complaints. The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 13,1970, in a heart ease. The record establishes that the decedent bad a severe cardiac condition prior to the fire on October 18, 1968, but there was medical testimony that as a result of the fire the decedent was “ thrown into a state of coronary insufficiency ” and that the long and arduous hours of employment, coupled with the psychological stress necessarily resulting from the fire, imposed upon the “ insufficiency ” caused his death. There is ample evidence of the decedent’s physical condition without considering the hearsay evidence as to pain and other complaints. The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 895, 325 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hyman-v-v-i-typewriters-inc-nyappdiv-1971.