Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Hutcheson v. Trinity Tool & Die

Claim of Hutcheson v. Trinity Tool & Die

201 A.D.2d 826, 609 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1126
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 17, 1992, which, inter alia, modified a prior decision ruling that claimant did not sustain a causally related injury to his back.

The Board initially ruled that claimant’s back injury was not causally related to his employment. The employer now appeals from a decision of the Board which rescinded the prior decision and restored the case to the trial calendar for further development of the record, contending that the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We find that, because the decision neither decided all substantive issues nor involved a threshold legal issue, it is nonappealable.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Hutcheson v. Trinity Tool & Die, 201 A.D.2d 826, 609 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 826 (Claim of Hutcheson v. Trinity Tool & Die) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Apollo
245 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Claim of Palmer v. Mowers
240 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Claim of Supinski v. Bankers Trust Co.
235 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)