Claim of Hutcheson v. Trinity Tool & Die
This text of 201 A.D.2d 826 (Claim of Hutcheson v. Trinity Tool & Die) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 17, 1992, which, inter alia, modified a prior decision ruling that claimant did not sustain a causally related injury to his back.
The Board initially ruled that claimant’s back injury was not causally related to his employment. The employer now appeals from a decision of the Board which rescinded the prior decision and restored the case to the trial calendar for further development of the record, contending that the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We find that, because the decision neither decided all substantive issues nor involved a threshold legal issue, it is nonappealable.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.D.2d 826, 609 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hutcheson-v-trinity-tool-die-nyappdiv-1994.