Claim of Humphrey v. Marcuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Humphrey v. Marcuse

257 A.D. 1086, 14 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9201

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 1086 (Claim of Humphrey v. Marcuse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Humphrey v. Marcuse, 257 A.D. 1086, 14 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant has appealed from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying her claim for death benefits by reason of the death of her husband. The decedent was employed as a general houseman. His employer had a residence at Great Neck, Long Island, with a private beach on Long Island Sound. On July 30, 1938, decedent, together with the chauffeur, went to the beach to go swimming. Decedent could not swim. He was drowned. The State Industrial Board found that the accident causing death did not arise out of and in the course of the employment. The evidence sustains the finding. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant has appealed from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying her claim for death benefits by reason of the death of her husband. The decedent was employed as a general houseman. His employer had a residence at Great Neck, Long Island, with a private beach on Long Island Sound. On July 30, 1938, decedent, together with the chauffeur, went to the beach to go swimming. Decedent could not swim. He was drowned. The State Industrial Board found that the accident causing death did not arise out of and in the course of the employment. The evidence sustains the finding. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 1086, 14 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-humphrey-v-marcuse-nyappdiv-1939.