Claim of Hughes v. Held

263 A.D. 768, 30 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4867
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 768 (Claim of Hughes v. Held) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Hughes v. Held, 263 A.D. 768, 30 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the State Industrial Board which held that there was a causal relation between claimant’s accident and the condition in his right eye which necessitated enucleation of the eye. The award was for total temporary disability for six weeks and $600 for serious facial disfigurement. Claimant had lost the use of the eye sometime prior to the accident. There was medical proof that the accident was the exciting factor in lighting up this old condition and that the train of symptoms and objective findings resulted from the accident. There is also proof to sustain the finding of total temporary disability. The claim that the $600 awarded for serious facial disfigurement is excessive, in this instance raises only a question of fact which has been passed upon by the Industrial Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Riegle v. Fordon
273 A.D. 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 768, 30 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hughes-v-held-nyappdiv-1941.