Claim of Hudak v. Erie Railroad Co.

226 A.D. 710

Opinion

Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that claimant was engaged in work so closely related to interstate commerce as to be a part thereof; and on the authority of Scelfo v. Buffalo, R. & P. R. Co. (211 App. Div. 243); Stone v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. (Id. 638); Pedersen v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co. (229 U. S. 146); Erie Railroad Co. v. Szary (253 id. 86); Matter of Quirk v. Erie R. R. Co. (235 N. Y. 405). Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Hudak v. Erie Railroad Co., 226 A.D. 710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

226 A.D. 710 (Claim of Hudak v. Erie Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
229 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Matter of Quirk v. . Erie R.R. Co.
139 N.E. 556 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Scelfo v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.
211 A.D. 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)