Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Huber v. Cutler Hammer Manufacturing Co.

Claim of Huber v. Cutler Hammer Manufacturing Co.

243 A.D. 646
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 646 (Claim of Huber v. Cutler Hammer Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Huber v. Cutler Hammer Manufacturing Co., 243 A.D. 646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that so far as appears by the record, the claimant’s injury was confined to one member, the leg, and the award was improperly made under subdivision 3, paragraph v, of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Vogel v. Manhattan Dressed Beef Co., 221 App. Div. 823.) Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gruttaduria v. Imperial Metal Manufacturing Co.
250 A.D. 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Claim of Mestler v. American Book Sales Co.
248 A.D. 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-huber-v-cutler-hammer-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1935.