Claim of Huber v. Cutler Hammer Manufacturing Co.
243 A.D. 646
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that so far as appears by the record, the claimant’s injury was confined to one member, the leg, and the award was improperly made under subdivision 3, paragraph v, of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Vogel v. Manhattan Dressed Beef Co., 221 App. Div. 823.) Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Huber v. Cutler Hammer Manufacturing Co., 243 A.D. 646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
243 A.D. 646 (Claim of Huber v. Cutler Hammer Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gruttaduria v. Imperial Metal Manufacturing Co.
250 A.D. 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Claim of Mestler v. American Book Sales Co.
248 A.D. 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)