Claim of Hoye v. City of New York

268 A.D. 944, 51 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4335
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 1944·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an award of compensation for six weeks disability. The sole question is whether claimant suffered an accidental injury. He was employed by the City of New York in the Department of Sanitation, and on the day of the alleged accident was assigned to distribute circulars. While engaged in the work he fell on the street. No witness was produced who saw him fall, and claimant could not remember -what caused Mm to fall. The record discloses no substantial evi[945]*945dence of any pathological condition which would account for the fall. Claimant’» injuries, the place where his body was found and its position, and the inference that may be drawn therefrom, coupled with the presumption of the statute, are sufficient to sustain the finding of an accident. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Hoye v. City of New York, 268 A.D. 944, 51 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 944 (Claim of Hoye v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Solomon v. Solo Slipper Corp.
11 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Claim of Frye v. Glazebrook
285 A.D. 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)