Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

20 A.D.2d 598, 246 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 598 (Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 20 A.D.2d 598, 246 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Decision affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur; Bergan, P. J., and Gibson, J., dissent and vote to reverse and remit for an unequivocal determination whether or not the disease, as shown on this record, is an occupational disease in the light of the medical and other proof indicating a recognizable link between the employment and the disabling condition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.D.2d 598, 246 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hoare-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1963.