Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

202 N.E.2d 554, 15 N.Y.2d 493, 254 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 887
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 15, 1964
StatusPublished

This text of 202 N.E.2d 554 (Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 202 N.E.2d 554, 15 N.Y.2d 493, 254 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 887 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Vookhis, Burke and Scileppi. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 N.E.2d 554, 15 N.Y.2d 493, 254 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hoare-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-ny-1964.