Claim of Hinz v. United Dry Dock, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hinz v. United Dry Dock, Inc.

250 A.D. 792, 293 N.Y.S. 766, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9017

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 792 (Claim of Hinz v. United Dry Dock, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hinz v. United Dry Dock, Inc., 250 A.D. 792, 293 N.Y.S. 766, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision denying an award for disability on account of occupational disease. The claimant was employed in a place where work was done upon brasses and other metals, of which zinc was a component part, and contends that he became disabled, and suffered from zinc poisoning. There is medical evidence that would support the finding of the Board that the claimant was not suffering from a disease which was due or related to the nature of his employment. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — ■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision denying an award for disability on account of occupational disease. The claimant was employed in a place where work was done upon brasses and other metals, of which zinc was a component part, and contends that he became disabled, and suffered from zinc poisoning. There is medical evidence that would support the finding of the Board that the claimant was not suffering from a disease which was due or related to the nature of his employment. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — ■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 792, 293 N.Y.S. 766, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hinz-v-united-dry-dock-inc-nyappdiv-1937.