Claim of Hill v. American Courier Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hill v. American Courier Corp.

38 A.D.2d 987, 329 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5248

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 987 (Claim of Hill v. American Courier Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hill v. American Courier Corp., 38 A.D.2d 987, 329 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed August 19, 1970 and Aprl 20, 1971. The board has found that the claimant’s part-time occupation as a truck driver for appellant was sufficiently similar to his regular employment as a tractor driver in the Post Office to entitle him to benefits based on his total earnings from the two jobs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s factual finding. (Matter of McDowell v. Flatbush Congregational Church, 252 App. Div. 799, affd. 277 N. Y. 536; Matter of Hafner v. Boutell Driveaway Co., 269 App. Div. 917, mot. for lv. to app. den. 295 N. Y. 989; Matter of Walla v. Streigel, 2 A D 2d 914, mot. for lv. to app. den. 2 N Y 2d 708.) Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Simons and Kane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed August 19, 1970 and Aprl 20, 1971. The board has found that the claimant’s part-time occupation as a truck driver for appellant was sufficiently similar to his regular employment as a tractor driver in the Post Office to entitle him to benefits based on his total earnings from the two jobs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s factual finding. (Matter of McDowell v. Flatbush Congregational Church, 252 App. Div. 799, affd. 277 N. Y. 536; Matter of Hafner v. Boutell Driveaway Co., 269 App. Div. 917, mot. for lv. to app. den. 295 N. Y. 989; Matter of Walla v. Streigel, 2 A D 2d 914, mot. for lv. to app. den. 2 N Y 2d 708.) Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Simons and Kane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 987, 329 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hill-v-american-courier-corp-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack