Claim of Hile v. Byrns Motor Express/Ryder Transportation Services, Inc.

103 A.D.2d 969, 477 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19638

This text of 103 A.D.2d 969 (Claim of Hile v. Byrns Motor Express/Ryder Transportation Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Hile v. Byrns Motor Express/Ryder Transportation Services, Inc., 103 A.D.2d 969, 477 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without [970]*970costs. Inasmuch as the decision sought to be appealed is interlocutory and decides no threshold legal issues, it is not appealable (see Matter of Harris v Carborundum, Co., 72 AD2d 869). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Harris v. Carborundum Co.
72 A.D.2d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.2d 969, 477 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hile-v-byrns-motor-expressryder-transportation-services-inc-nyappdiv-1984.