Claim of Hicks v. James Groome & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hicks v. James Groome & Co.

43 A.D.2d 772, 350 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 772 (Claim of Hicks v. James Groome & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hicks v. James Groome & Co., 43 A.D.2d 772, 350 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed July 31, 1972, affirming an award of death benefits to the claimants at a combined rate of $80 per week. Claimants are the parents of the deceased employee who died as the result of an industrial accident on June 29, 1971. At the time of his death, his average weekly wage, as found by the Referee, was $168. The award was made to the claimants based upon their financial dependency upon the deceased. On this appeal, the finding of dependency is not disputed; appellants challenge the amount of the award which is greater than the $35 per week, plus occasional additional amounts, which claimants received from the deceased. The amount of an award for death benefits to dependent parents where there is no surviving spouse or dependent children, as in the present case, is determined by statutory formula (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 16, subd. 4) subject to such limitations as are set forth therein (see Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 16, subds. 4, 5). The Legislature has not seen fit to explicitly limit the award to amounts previously received by the dependents, and this court has upheld awards which were greater than the amount of a decedent’s financial contributions. {Matter of Hess v. Bonner Steel Go., 191 App. Div. 667, affd. 230 N. Y. 596; see, also, Matter of Gilbert v. Happy Hill Farm, 23 A D 2d 931.) Appellants’ argument that the statutory purpose was to reflect the level of support formerly provided to the claimants is not well taken, for the formula is based upon a percentage of the decedent’s wages, rather than his prior contributions. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Sweeney and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed July 31, 1972, affirming an award of death benefits to the claimants at a combined rate of $80 per week. Claimants are the parents of the deceased employee who died as the result of an industrial accident on June 29, 1971. At the time of his death, his average weekly wage, as found by the Referee, was $168. The award was made to the claimants based upon their financial dependency upon the deceased. On this appeal, the finding of dependency is not disputed; appellants challenge the amount of the award which is greater than the $35 per week, plus occasional additional amounts, which claimants received from the deceased. The amount of an award for death benefits to dependent parents where there is no surviving spouse or dependent children, as in the present case, is determined by statutory formula (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 16, subd. 4) subject to such limitations as are set forth therein (see Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 16, subds. 4, 5). The Legislature has not seen fit to explicitly limit the award to amounts previously received by the dependents, and this court has upheld awards which were greater than the amount of a decedent’s financial contributions. {Matter of Hess v. Bonner Steel Go., 191 App. Div. 667, affd. 230 N. Y. 596; see, also, Matter of Gilbert v. Happy Hill Farm, 23 A D 2d 931.) Appellants’ argument that the statutory purpose was to reflect the level of support formerly provided to the claimants is not well taken, for the formula is based upon a percentage of the decedent’s wages, rather than his prior contributions. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Sweeney and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 772, 350 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hicks-v-james-groome-co-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack