Claim of Hicks v. Boden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hicks v. Boden

282 A.D. 781, 122 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4946

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 781 (Claim of Hicks v. Boden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hicks v. Boden, 282 A.D. 781, 122 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was a laundry worker who “ for years ” worked one day a week, on Friday. She received $8 for the day and twenty cents carfare. She was totally disabled in an accident. Her rate of compensation has been fixed by the board in pursuance of subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, at $21.03 a week. The compensation thus fixed was almost three times her earnings. For the reasons stated in Matter of Derion v. Gilford Mfg. Go. (282 App. Div. 788), decided concurrently herewith, the decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board are reversed, and the claim remitted to the board for further proceedings, with costs to appellants. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was a laundry worker who “ for years ” worked one day a week, on Friday. She received $8 for the day and twenty cents carfare. She was totally disabled in an accident. Her rate of compensation has been fixed by the board in pursuance of subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, at $21.03 a week. The compensation thus fixed was almost three times her earnings. For the reasons stated in Matter of Derion v. Gilford Mfg. Go. (282 App. Div. 788), decided concurrently herewith, the decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board are reversed, and the claim remitted to the board for further proceedings, with costs to appellants. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 781, 122 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hicks-v-boden-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack