Claim of Heimroth v. Elk Transportation Co.

259 A.D. 944, 19 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7381
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Deceased was a watchman in the plant of the employer. The inferences to be drawn from conditions found there indicate that he was killed in the performance of his duties. Kick, who has pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree, in connection with decedent’s death gives evidence upon which the Board have disallowed the claim. That witness, by pleading and admitting that he was guilty of murder in the second degree, disputes and repudiates the testimony appearing in the record and makes it unworthy of belief. The decision should be reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. Decision reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Heimroth v. Elk Transportation Co., 259 A.D. 944, 19 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 944 (Claim of Heimroth v. Elk Transportation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Moran v. Moran Transportation Lines
264 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)