Claim of Heimroth v. Elk Transportation Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Heimroth v. Elk Transportation Co.

259 A.D. 944, 19 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7381

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 944 (Claim of Heimroth v. Elk Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Heimroth v. Elk Transportation Co., 259 A.D. 944, 19 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Deceased was a watchman in the plant of the employer. The inferences to be drawn from conditions found there indicate that he was killed in the performance of his duties. Kick, who has pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree, in connection with decedent’s death gives evidence upon which the Board have disallowed the claim. That witness, by pleading and admitting that he was guilty of murder in the second degree, disputes and repudiates the testimony appearing in the record and makes it unworthy of belief. The decision should be reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. Decision reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deceased was a watchman in the plant of the employer. The inferences to be drawn from conditions found there indicate that he was killed in the performance of his duties. Kick, who has pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree, in connection with decedent’s death gives evidence upon which the Board have disallowed the claim. That witness, by pleading and admitting that he was guilty of murder in the second degree, disputes and repudiates the testimony appearing in the record and makes it unworthy of belief. The decision should be reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. Decision reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 944, 19 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-heimroth-v-elk-transportation-co-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack