Claim of Heffler v. Tariff
269 A.D. 913, 57 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4443
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 19, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appeal by carrier. The policy of insurance expressly covered the place of injury. The claimant worked for a copartnership. The policy of insurance was written in the name of one of the copartners. “ The name of the insured in the policy is not always important if the intent to cover the risk is clear.” (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 226 App. Div. 839, affd. 252 N. Y. 518.) Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Heffler v. Tariff, 269 A.D. 913, 57 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 913 (Claim of Heffler v. Tariff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schlueter v. Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance
18 A.D.2d 167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Claim of Engler v. Regent Bindery, Inc.
272 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)