Claim of Heffler v. Tariff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Heffler v. Tariff

269 A.D. 913, 57 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 913 (Claim of Heffler v. Tariff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Heffler v. Tariff, 269 A.D. 913, 57 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by carrier. The policy of insurance expressly covered the place of injury. The claimant worked for a copartnership. The policy of insurance was written in the name of one of the copartners. “ The name of the insured in the policy is not always important if the intent to cover the risk is clear.” (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 226 App. Div. 839, affd. 252 N. Y. 518.) Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by carrier. The policy of insurance expressly covered the place of injury. The claimant worked for a copartnership. The policy of insurance was written in the name of one of the copartners. “ The name of the insured in the policy is not always important if the intent to cover the risk is clear.” (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 226 App. Div. 839, affd. 252 N. Y. 518.) Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D. 913, 57 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-heffler-v-tariff-nyappdiv-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack