Claim of Hechtenthal v. Eisenberg
232 A.D. 715
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 232 A.D. 715 (Claim of Hechtenthal v. Eisenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Hechtenthal v. Eisenberg, 232 A.D. 715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. AH concur, except Hinman, J., who dissents and votes for reversal, and remittal, on the ground that there is no competent proof that the dermatitis was due to the cut on the finger.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hechtenthal-v-eisenberg-nyappdiv-1931.