Claim of Hatch v. Grand Union Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hatch v. Grand Union Co.

25 A.D.2d 894, 269 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4347

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 A.D.2d 894 (Claim of Hatch v. Grand Union Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hatch v. Grand Union Co., 25 A.D.2d 894, 269 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Aulisi, J.

Claimant, manager of a chain store, left the premises of the store and crossed a street to a parking lot in order to close the windows of his car and of the ears of several eoemployees. The cars were parked there in order to leave parking space on the street available for customers. The closing of the windows was necessitated by a sudden Summer rainstorm. On prior [895]*895similar occasions an employee, usually the one who was least busy at the time, would go out and close the windows in his own and his co-workers’ ears. The employer knew of and acquiesced in this practice. Claimant was struck by a car while crossing the street. The board was warranted in finding that there was no deviation from the employment. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aulisi, J.

Claimant, manager of a chain store, left the premises of the store and crossed a street to a parking lot in order to close the windows of his car and of the ears of several eoemployees. The cars were parked there in order to leave parking space on the street available for customers. The closing of the windows was necessitated by a sudden Summer rainstorm. On prior [895]*895similar occasions an employee, usually the one who was least busy at the time, would go out and close the windows in his own and his co-workers’ ears. The employer knew of and acquiesced in this practice. Claimant was struck by a car while crossing the street. The board was warranted in finding that there was no deviation from the employment. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 894, 269 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hatch-v-grand-union-co-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack