Claim of Hares v. Day Motor Co.

242 A.D. 883

Opinion

— Decision reversed and claim remitted, with costs to the claimant against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the third party being a non-resident and outside of the State during all of the time in question, the Statute of Limitations has not run, and there are no other facts showing any prejudice to the employer or the carrier, Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Hares v. Day Motor Co., 242 A.D. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 883 (Claim of Hares v. Day Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.