Claim of Hannon v. Cramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hannon v. Cramer

31 A.D.2d 858, 297 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 858 (Claim of Hannon v. Cramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hannon v. Cramer, 31 A.D.2d 858, 297 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by the individual employers an-d their insurance carrier from a decision -of the Workmen’s Compensation Board filed April 17, 1968. The appellants -contend that the claimant was not their employee at the time -of the accident. Upon the present record the testimony of the claimant constituted substantial evidence to support the finding of the board as to the identity -of the employer. Credibility is a factual issue solely within the province of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by the individual employers an-d their insurance carrier from a decision -of the Workmen’s Compensation Board filed April 17, 1968. The appellants -contend that the claimant was not their employee at the time -of the accident. Upon the present record the testimony of the claimant constituted substantial evidence to support the finding of the board as to the identity -of the employer. Credibility is a factual issue solely within the province of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 858, 297 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hannon-v-cramer-nyappdiv-1969.