Claim of Handelman v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Handelman v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

243 A.D. 660

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Deceased employee worked on ice wagon. Death resulted from an infection claimed to have been caused by a scratch on his elbow. Question raised by appellant is whether the declarations of the deceased were sufficiently corroborated. A third party saw the bleeding fresh wound. The other question is as to the dependency of the father and mother. Deceased gave all of his earnings to his parents. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deceased employee worked on ice wagon. Death resulted from an infection claimed to have been caused by a scratch on his elbow. Question raised by appellant is whether the declarations of the deceased were sufficiently corroborated. A third party saw the bleeding fresh wound. The other question is as to the dependency of the father and mother. Deceased gave all of his earnings to his parents. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Claim of Handelman v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 243 A.D. 660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 660 (Claim of Handelman v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related