Claim of Hammond v. City of Fulton

176 A.D. 343, 163 N.Y.S. 51, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5107
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 176 A.D. 343 (Claim of Hammond v. City of Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Hammond v. City of Fulton, 176 A.D. 343, 163 N.Y.S. 51, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinions

De Angelis, J.:

The order has for its alleged basis section 205 of the G-eneral Municipal Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 24; Laws of 1909, chap. 29), as amended by chapter 400 of the Laws of 1914, and section 119 of the charter of the city of Fulton, being chapter 63 of the Laws of 1902.

Leon Hammond, the husband of the petitioner, died on the 30th day of November, 1915, as the result of injuries suffered by him on that day while engaged in the performance of his duties as a call fireman of the city of Fulton. His wife, the petitioner, was duly appointed administratrix of his estate by the Surrogate’s Court of Oswego county, December 27, 1915, [344]*344and on the same day filed a claim against the city for the sum of $2,500. The claim was rejected by the city authorities whereupon by petition she instituted the proceeding resulting in the order appealed from. The county judge wrote an opinion and also made a formal decision containing findings of fact and conclusions of law which appear in the record. There was no controversy between the parties as to the facts and the defendant filed exceptions to the conclusions of law.

The defendant’s charter shows that it was created from the former village of Fulton and village of Oswego Falls. Section 4 of the charter contains the following provision: ‘‘ All rules and regulations pertaining to the government of the fire departments of the said villages, in force at the time of the passage of this act, shall remain, be and continue the same under the said city as under said village governments until repeal thereof and the adoption of other and further rules and regulations in relation thereto; and all officers and members of said fire departments of the villages of Fulton and Oswego Falls shall become and be the officers and members of the fire department of the city of Fulton, and shall perform all the duties devolving upon them as such firemen, and have and retain all the rights and privileges in the same manner and in all respects as if this act had not been passed, subject, however, to the further provisions of this act. The ownership and control of all the property and effects pertaining to or connected with the fire departments of said villages shall, by virtue of this act, vest in the city of Fulton, in the same manner and to the same extent in all respects as the same is now vested in said villages and fire departments.”

Sections 115, 116, 117 and 119 of the charter are as follows:

§ 115. Organization of fire department.—The fire department shall consist of a chief, an assistant chief, eight paid firemen, and as many call men as the board of fire and police commissioners, from time to time, may determine to be necessary.'
“§ 116. Volunteer firemen to be preferred.—Active members of the volunteer fire companies comprising the existing fire departments of Fulton and Oswego Falls shall be preferred in all appointments, except chief and assistant, provided they [345]*345possess the qualifications prescribed by the hoard of fire and police commissioners) and provided also that no person shall be appointed a paid fireman who shall at the time of his appointment be above the age of thirty-five years.
“§ 117. Pay of firemen.— The chief shall receive an annual salary of two hundred dollars, the assistant chief shall receive an annual salary of one hundred dollars, the paid firemen shall receive a monthly salary of forty dollars, the call men shall receive such compensation per hour for service at fires or when called out for practice or review, as shall be determined by the hoard of fire and police commissioners, not however, exceeding fifty cents per hour, to be audited by said board and paid by the chamberlain on its order.”
§ 119. Exemption of firemen from military and jury duty. — The chief, assistant chief, and paid men of the said fire department shall be exempt from military and jury duty while in the service of the city, and the call men shall be entitled to the same privileges and exemptions as are accorded by the laws of this State to volunteer firemen.”

At the time of the adoption of the charter of the city of Fulton, chapter 615 of the Laws of 1895 provided that if an active member of a volunteer fire company in any incorporated village or in any fire district of a town outside of an incorporated village died from injuries incurred while in the performance of his duties as such fireman within one year thereafter, the village or town should pay to his executor or administrator for the benefit of his next of kin the sum of $500, and such sum was made a charge upon the village or town to be assessed upon the property and persons in such village or fire district liable to taxation, and to be levied and collected in the same manner as other village taxes or town charges. This act-was amended by chapter 49 of the Laws of 1906 and thereby its provisions were extended to active members of volunteer fire companies in cities. This provision so amended was incorporated into the Consolidated Laws and became section 205 of the General Municipal Law (supra). Such section was amended by chapter 400 of the Laws of 1914, and it is under the provisions of the section as so amended that the petitioner made her claim which has been allowed by the county judge. The amount to be paid as [346]*346provided in the amended section was increased from $500 to $2,500. In this amended law there is a provision for relief applicable to a city which maintains a pension fund which has no bearing here because the city of Fulton has no pension fund.

It is entirely clear that at the time of the adoption of the charter of the city of Fulton there existed no general law of the State entitling the estate of a fireman in a city to any sum of money in case of his death while in the performance of his duties or otherwise. Although the provisions' of the charter already quoted show that in the two villages which gave their life to the creation of the city there existed volunteer fire companies, it cannot he successfully claimed that any provision in the charter carried to any persons who became firemen -under the charter the benefit of chapter 615 of the Laws of 1895. There is no claim that the petitioner’s decedent had been a volunteer fireman in either village. It is true that the volunteer firemen of the villages were to be preferred in all appointments in the fire department of the city except those of chief and assistant chief (Charter, § 116), but such of the volunteer firemen of the villages as might have been appointed to any of the positions in the fire department of the city did not retain their status as volunteer firemen. The fact that they received no pay for their services distinguishes volunteer firemen as such. The designation of certain firemen as “ call men ” appears in subdivision 8 of section 200 of chapter 111 of the Laws of 1891, being chapter 21 of the General Laws, the then existing general Village Law. In that legislation they are described as “duty or ‘call men,”’ and provision was made to compensate them for their services. In the classification of the firemen of the city the description of some of them as “paid firemen ” does not seem quite appropriate because the. chief, the assistant chief, and the call men are likewise paid men as shown by section 111 of the charter, so that little significance exists in describing these men as “paid firemen ” other than for the simple purpose of classification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Biegel v. Village of North Hills
185 Misc. 131 (New York County Courts, 1945)
Miller v. Town of Irondequoit
240 A.D. 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Smith v. Incorporated Village of Sea Cliff
146 Misc. 685 (New York County Courts, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 343, 163 N.Y.S. 51, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hammond-v-city-of-fulton-nyappdiv-1917.