Claim of Hajek v. Brown

255 A.D. 729, 6 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4934
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 21, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The employer and insurance carrier have appealed from an award in claimant’s favor. Appellants contend that the Board erred in making the entire award against them. They assert that a part thereof should be charged against the State Insurance Fund. The proof shows that claimant became disabled in 1932, while working for the employer, due to lead poisoning. At that time he was absent from his employment but a few days. The State Insurance Fund was then the carrier. From that illness he completely recovered. In 1936 he again became disabled from lead poisoning. There is no proof which would warrant a finding that this was a recurrence of the 1932 disability. The State Industrial Board so found and the evidence sustains that conclusion. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Hajek v. Brown, 255 A.D. 729, 6 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 729 (Claim of Hajek v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Esmond Mills, Inc. v. American Woolen Co.
68 A.2d 920 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1949)