Claim of Gustafson v. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Gustafson v. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc.

246 A.D. 877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 877 (Claim of Gustafson v. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Gustafson v. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., 246 A.D. 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The award in this 0ease is opposed because the wage rate upon which the Industrial Board based compensation is, the appellant contends, erroneous. The Board held that the deceased had not worked in the employment in which he was working at the time of the accident during substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding the injuries and that, therefore, his compensation should be determined in accordance with subdivision 2 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. In the employer’s report of injury he stated the earnings of the claimant to be sixty-seven dollars per week. The award is at the rate of twenty-five dollars per week. The award was properly made. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The award in this 0ease is opposed because the wage rate upon which the Industrial Board based compensation is, the appellant contends, erroneous. The Board held that the deceased had not worked in the employment in which he was working at the time of the accident during substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding the injuries and that, therefore, his compensation should be determined in accordance with subdivision 2 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. In the employer’s report of injury he stated the earnings of the claimant to be sixty-seven dollars per week. The award is at the rate of twenty-five dollars per week. The award was properly made. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-gustafson-v-allen-n-spooner-son-inc-nyappdiv-1936.