Claim of Grova v. Bottge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Grova v. Bottge

73 A.D.2d 763, 423 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14622

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 A.D.2d 763 (Claim of Grova v. Bottge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Grova v. Bottge, 73 A.D.2d 763, 423 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 29, 1978. The board found: "based on the testimony of Mr. Jacobs, the insurance underwriter, Mr. Lawson, the broker, and the employer, carrier failed to notify the employer of its intention not to renew as required by Section 54 Subd. 5 of the Workers’ Compensation Law and is therefore, liable for the payment of compensation.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. In addition, the requirement that notice of intention not to renew a workers’ compensation insurance policy be served on the employer became effective July 1, 1971, not July 1, 1973 as erroneously urged by counsel (see L 1971, ch 667, § 2) and, thus, applied to the policy herein which expired on May 25, 1972. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs against the insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 29, 1978. The board found: "based on the testimony of Mr. Jacobs, the insurance underwriter, Mr. Lawson, the broker, and the employer, carrier failed to notify the employer of its intention not to renew as required by Section 54 Subd. 5 of the Workers’ Compensation Law and is therefore, liable for the payment of compensation.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. In addition, the requirement that notice of intention not to renew a workers’ compensation insurance policy be served on the employer became effective July 1, 1971, not July 1, 1973 as erroneously urged by counsel (see L 1971, ch 667, § 2) and, thus, applied to the policy herein which expired on May 25, 1972. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs against the insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 763, 423 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-grova-v-bottge-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack