Claim of Griffin v. Eastman Kodak Co.
425 N.E.2d 885, 53 N.Y.2d 1028, 442 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2554
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 12, p 56).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Griffin v. Eastman Kodak Co., 425 N.E.2d 885, 53 N.Y.2d 1028, 442 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2554 (N.Y. 1981).
425 N.E.2d 885 (Claim of Griffin v. Eastman Kodak Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ramirez v. IBP, Inc.
913 F. Supp. 1421 (D. Kansas, 1995)
Claim of Duncan v. New York State Developmental Center
470 N.E.2d 820 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Claim of Kaye v. Brewster Central School District Board of Education
103 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Claim of Duncan v. New York State Development Center
93 A.D.2d 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)