Claim of Green v. Brand Mid-Atlantic, Inc.

198 A.D.2d 633, 603 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10546
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 4, 1992, which ruled that claimant’s case be restored to the trial calendar and that he continue receiving disability payments.

The employer argues that the Board’s decision, directing the continuation of temporary total disability payments to claimant pending further development of the record with medical testimony on the issue of degree of disability, was arbitrary and capricious. We, however, agree with the Board that its decision on these issues was interlocutory and did not involve [634] a threshold legal issue. The decision is therefore not appeal-able.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Green v. Brand Mid-Atlantic, Inc., 198 A.D.2d 633, 603 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 633 (Claim of Green v. Brand Mid-Atlantic, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Morales v. Metropolitan Life
284 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Claim of Supinski v. Bankers Trust Co.
235 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)