Claim of Goodwin v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Board

202 N.E.2d 560, 15 N.Y.2d 508, 254 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 897
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1964·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Burke and Bergan. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Goodwin v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Board, 202 N.E.2d 560, 15 N.Y.2d 508, 254 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 897 (N.Y. 1964).

202 N.E.2d 560 (Claim of Goodwin v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Film v. Holmes Transportation
147 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Transportation Insurance Co. v. Maksyn
567 S.W.2d 845 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)