Claim of Goodwin v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Board
202 N.E.2d 560, 15 N.Y.2d 508, 254 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 897
This text of 202 N.E.2d 560 (Claim of Goodwin v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Goodwin v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Board, 202 N.E.2d 560, 15 N.Y.2d 508, 254 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 897 (N.Y. 1964).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Burke and Bergan. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Film v. Holmes Transportation
147 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Transportation Insurance Co. v. Maksyn
567 S.W.2d 845 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
202 N.E.2d 560, 15 N.Y.2d 508, 254 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-goodwin-v-new-york-state-workmens-compensation-board-ny-1964.