Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc.

191 N.E. 538, 264 N.Y. 508, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1549

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1934·Published

Opinion

*510 Order reversed and award of the State Industrial Board reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that the determination of the State Industrial Board that the New York Machinery Wrecking and Boiler Cutting Company was a subcontractor is sustained by the evidence. No opinion.-

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*510 Order reversed and award of the State Industrial Board reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that the determination of the State Industrial Board that the New York Machinery Wrecking and Boiler Cutting Company was a subcontractor is sustained by the evidence. No opinion.-

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc., 191 N.E. 538, 264 N.Y. 508, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1549 (N.Y. 1934).

Pincite

191 N.E. 538 (Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.