Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc.

191 N.E. 538, 264 N.Y. 508, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1549

DecidedMarch 20, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 191 N.E. 538 (Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Goldstein v. Marc Eidlitz & Son, Inc., 191 N.E. 538, 264 N.Y. 508, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1549 (N.Y. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

*510 Order reversed and award of the State Industrial Board reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that the determination of the State Industrial Board that the New York Machinery Wrecking and Boiler Cutting Company was a subcontractor is sustained by the evidence. No opinion.-

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*510 Order reversed and award of the State Industrial Board reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that the determination of the State Industrial Board that the New York Machinery Wrecking and Boiler Cutting Company was a subcontractor is sustained by the evidence. No opinion.-

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 N.E. 538, 264 N.Y. 508, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-goldstein-v-marc-eidlitz-son-inc-ny-1934.