Claim of Goldstein v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Goldstein v. Goldstein

243 A.D. 657

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Policy insured the Goldie Dress Company. Claimant worked for the Goldie Dress Company both at the time policy was issued and at the time of the accident. After the issuance of the policy one “ proprietor ” retired from the Goldie Dress Company. The business continued otherwise without change. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against the appellant. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim as against the carrier, on the authority of Matter of Ardolino v. lerna (225 App. Div. 439).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Policy insured the Goldie Dress Company. Claimant worked for the Goldie Dress Company both at the time policy was issued and at the time of the accident. After the issuance of the policy one “ proprietor ” retired from the Goldie Dress Company. The business continued otherwise without change. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against the appellant. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim as against the carrier, on the authority of Matter of Ardolino v. lerna (225 App. Div. 439).

Claim of Goldstein v. Goldstein, 243 A.D. 657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 657 (Claim of Goldstein v. Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related