Claim of Goldstein v. Goldstein
This text of 243 A.D. 657 (Claim of Goldstein v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Policy insured the Goldie Dress Company. Claimant worked for the Goldie Dress Company both at the time policy was issued and at the time of the accident. After the issuance of the policy one “ proprietor ” retired from the Goldie Dress Company. The business continued otherwise without change. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against the appellant. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim as against the carrier, on the authority of Matter of Ardolino v. lerna (225 App. Div. 439).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-goldstein-v-goldstein-nyappdiv-1935.