Claim of Goldman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Goldman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

252 A.D. 711, 298 N.Y.S. 846, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5832

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1937·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an award to claimant, who was employed as a collector and solicitor. The State Industrial Board found that while soliciting insurance and delivering insurance policies to a customer he entered a restaurant to eat and while looking for a wash room in the restaurant he fell down a flight of stairs sustaining the injuries in question. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board. (See Matter of Johnson v. Smith, 263 N. Y. 10.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award to claimant, who was employed as a collector and solicitor. The State Industrial Board found that while soliciting insurance and delivering insurance policies to a customer he entered a restaurant to eat and while looking for a wash room in the restaurant he fell down a flight of stairs sustaining the injuries in question. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board. (See Matter of Johnson v. Smith, 263 N. Y. 10.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Claim of Goldman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance, 252 A.D. 711, 298 N.Y.S. 846, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 711 (Claim of Goldman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related