Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.

234 A.D. 810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 810 (Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp., 234 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Whitmyer, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of claim, on the ground that the claimant was not in the course of the employment when injured. (Johnson v. Faribault Bldg. Corp., 192 App. Div. 929; revd. on dissenting opinion below, 229 N. Y. 626; Culhane v. Economical Garage Co., 188 App. Div. 1.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Whitmyer, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of claim, on the ground that the claimant was not in the course of the employment when injured. (Johnson v. Faribault Bldg. Corp., 192 App. Div. 929; revd. on dissenting opinion below, 229 N. Y. 626; Culhane v. Economical Garage Co., 188 App. Div. 1.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-glicksman-v-new-york-rapid-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack