Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
234 A.D. 810
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1931·Published
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Whitmyer, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of claim, on the ground that the claimant was not in the course of the employment when injured. (Johnson v. Faribault Bldg. Corp., 192 App. Div. 929; revd. on dissenting opinion below, 229 N. Y. 626; Culhane v. Economical Garage Co., 188 App. Div. 1.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp., 234 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
234 A.D. 810 (Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Johnson v. . Faribault Building Corporation
129 N.E. 934 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Claim of Culhane v. Economical Garage Co.
188 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Claim of Johnson v. Faribault Building Corp.
192 A.D. 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)