Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Gentner v. Rice

Claim of Gentner v. Rice

265 A.D. 1020, 38 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6664
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 A.D. 1020 (Claim of Gentner v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Gentner v. Rice, 265 A.D. 1020, 38 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

[1021]*1021Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents upon the ground that at the time of the first hearing there was on file with the Industrial Commissioner, and therefore before the referee and all parties, written notice that the carrier was controverting the case upon the ground that the notice of claim was not filed within the statutory period. This was ample compliance with section 28 of the statute and there was no waiver by the carrier of this objection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim Friedenzohn v. Three Star Offset Printing
176 A.D.2d 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 1020, 38 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-gentner-v-rice-nyappdiv-1943.