Claim of Garelick v. Rosen
248 A.D. 924, 290 N.Y.S. 271, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8091
Opinion
The statement in Matter of Orlando v. Rosen [ante, p. 924], decided herewith, is applicable to this case. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents on the ground stated in his dissent in Matter of Orlando v. Rosen [ante, p. 924], decided herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Garelick v. Rosen, 248 A.D. 924, 290 N.Y.S. 271, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 924 (Claim of Garelick v. Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.