Claim of Gandolfo v. R. H. Macy & Co.
222 A.D. 844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. The misnomer of the employer was not prejudicial and was waived. The report of the employer admits that the claimant was its employee. Present — Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Gandolfo v. R. H. Macy & Co., 222 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
222 A.D. 844 (Claim of Gandolfo v. R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Wise v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
230 A.D. 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)