Claim of Galligan v. Edward Langer Printing Co.
223 A.D. 796
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The conduct of the referee in curtailing the cross-examination of claimant’s doctor was arbitrary and unreasonable. We disapprove of it; but there was evidence to sustain the finding of causal relation, which was the only other question, and we think that no harm resulted. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Galligan v. Edward Langer Printing Co., 223 A.D. 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
223 A.D. 796 (Claim of Galligan v. Edward Langer Printing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of De Crescenzo v. Apex Concrete Co.
246 A.D. 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)