Claim of Galligan v. Edward Langer Printing Co.
This text of 223 A.D. 796 (Claim of Galligan v. Edward Langer Printing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conduct of the referee in curtailing the cross-examination of claimant’s doctor was arbitrary and unreasonable. We disapprove of it; but there was evidence to sustain the finding of causal relation, which was the only other question, and we think that no harm resulted. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-galligan-v-edward-langer-printing-co-nyappdiv-1928.