Claim of Funicello v. Chain Building Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Funicello v. Chain Building Corp.

251 A.D. 759, 295 N.Y.S. 609, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 759 (Claim of Funicello v. Chain Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Funicello v. Chain Building Corp., 251 A.D. 759, 295 N.Y.S. 609, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

The employer and insurance carrier have appealed from an award in claimant’s favor. The sole question presented for review is whether or not the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. Claimant was employed as a watchman by the employer and the Industrial Board found that on the 13th day of December, 1934, while he was engaged in his regular occupation and while guarding the premises of his employer he was attacked and assaulted by unknown persons and sustained the injuries in question. The evidence sustains the finding. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The employer and insurance carrier have appealed from an award in claimant’s favor. The sole question presented for review is whether or not the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. Claimant was employed as a watchman by the employer and the Industrial Board found that on the 13th day of December, 1934, while he was engaged in his regular occupation and while guarding the premises of his employer he was attacked and assaulted by unknown persons and sustained the injuries in question. The evidence sustains the finding. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 759, 295 N.Y.S. 609, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-funicello-v-chain-building-corp-nyappdiv-1937.