Claim of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters, Inc.

281 A.D. 934, 119 N.Y.S.2d 681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 934 (Claim of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters, Inc., 281 A.D. 934, 119 N.Y.S.2d 681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board granting disability compensation to claimant. The board has found that claimant contracted bursitis in her right shoulder, an occupational disease, as a result of repeatedly lifting and moving boxes. The evidence is sufficient to present a question of fact and to sustain the finding. While the disease was contracted more than twelve months prior to disablement, claimant continued in the same employment with the same employer from the time the disease was contracted until the time of her disablement. The fact that she may not have done precisely the same kind of work during all of that time does not remove her from the " same employment ”. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ. [See post, p. 1051.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board granting disability compensation to claimant. The board has found that claimant contracted bursitis in her right shoulder, an occupational disease, as a result of repeatedly lifting and moving boxes. The evidence is sufficient to present a question of fact and to sustain the finding. While the disease was contracted more than twelve months prior to disablement, claimant continued in the same employment with the same employer from the time the disease was contracted until the time of her disablement. The fact that she may not have done precisely the same kind of work during all of that time does not remove her from the " same employment ”. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ. [See post, p. 1051.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 934, 119 N.Y.S.2d 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-frank-v-freedman-die-cutters-inc-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack