Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance

220 N.E.2d 810, 18 N.Y.2d 729, 274 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1102
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 1966·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs. (See, also, Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hosp., 259 N. Y. 137; Matter of Stern v. Electrol, Inc., 4 A D 2d 110, mot. for lv. to app. den. 3 N Y 2d 707.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance, 220 N.E.2d 810, 18 N.Y.2d 729, 274 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1102 (N.Y. 1966).

220 N.E.2d 810 (Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Rayford v. National Union of Hospital & Nursing Home Employees
57 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People v. Rodriguez
341 N.E.2d 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)