Claim of Ficucello v. Kerwin Motors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Ficucello v. Kerwin Motors, Inc.

252 A.D. 716, 298 N.Y.S. 1001, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5851

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1937·Published

Opinion

-— Appeal from an award to claimant, who while employed as a mechanic struck his head in the region of the eye against an iron post causing a detached retina. The appellants assert that there was lack of proof of causal relation between' the accident and the loss of vision. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-— Appeal from an award to claimant, who while employed as a mechanic struck his head in the region of the eye against an iron post causing a detached retina. The appellants assert that there was lack of proof of causal relation between' the accident and the loss of vision. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Claim of Ficucello v. Kerwin Motors, Inc., 252 A.D. 716, 298 N.Y.S. 1001, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 716 (Claim of Ficucello v. Kerwin Motors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.