Claim of Fichtner v. Bloomingdale Bros.

151 N.E.2d 94, 4 N.Y.2d 914, 174 N.Y.S.2d 663, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 1014
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 8, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 N.E.2d 94 (Claim of Fichtner v. Bloomingdale Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Fichtner v. Bloomingdale Bros., 151 N.E.2d 94, 4 N.Y.2d 914, 174 N.Y.S.2d 663, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 1014 (N.Y. 1958).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to respondents employer and carrier; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis and Bubke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF FICHTNER v. Bloomingdale Bros.
151 N.E.2d 94 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 N.E.2d 94, 4 N.Y.2d 914, 174 N.Y.S.2d 663, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-fichtner-v-bloomingdale-bros-ny-1958.