Claim of Feuerstein v. A. Feder & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Feuerstein v. A. Feder & Co.

247 A.D. 843

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 A.D. 843 (Claim of Feuerstein v. A. Feder & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Feuerstein v. A. Feder & Co., 247 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award in favor of claimant. On February 17, 1930, claimant was working for the employer, an awning manufacturer, and while lifting a bundle of iron awning frames sprained his back and by reason thereof suffered a partial disability. Later and on November 17, 1933, while engaged in the same employment and while lifting an awning he again sprained his back and sustained disability. The Board has found the disability was contributed to by both accidents and has made the award against the employer and both the carrier which was the insurer at the time of the first accident and the carrier which was the insurer at the time of the second accident. The appellant carrier asserts that it is not liable in whole or in part for the award. The evidence sustains the finding of the Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent Maryland Casualty Company against the appellants. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award in favor of claimant. On February 17, 1930, claimant was working for the employer, an awning manufacturer, and while lifting a bundle of iron awning frames sprained his back and by reason thereof suffered a partial disability. Later and on November 17, 1933, while engaged in the same employment and while lifting an awning he again sprained his back and sustained disability. The Board has found the disability was contributed to by both accidents and has made the award against the employer and both the carrier which was the insurer at the time of the first accident and the carrier which was the insurer at the time of the second accident. The appellant carrier asserts that it is not liable in whole or in part for the award. The evidence sustains the finding of the Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent Maryland Casualty Company against the appellants. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-feuerstein-v-a-feder-co-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack