Claim of Fazio v. A. Torregrosso & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Fazio v. A. Torregrosso & Sons, Inc.

62 A.D.2d 1128, 404 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1128 (Claim of Fazio v. A. Torregrosso & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Fazio v. A. Torregrosso & Sons, Inc., 62 A.D.2d 1128, 404 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed June 23, 1977, which affirmed a referee’s decision finding that the claim for compensation was timely filed under section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The board found: "the payment made to the claimant for one month after the accident was an advance payment of compensation. The claimant was hospitalized for the period February 5 to February 14 during which period payment was being made. The trip undertaken was at the behest and inured to the benefit of the employer. Payment made to the claimant was not for work rendered nor was it vacation pay due to the claimant. The employer was aware of the severity of claimant’s condition and continued to pay her salary, thereby constituting an advance payment of compensation to toll the application of Section 28.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed June 23, 1977, which affirmed a referee’s decision finding that the claim for compensation was timely filed under section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The board found: "the payment made to the claimant for one month after the accident was an advance payment of compensation. The claimant was hospitalized for the period February 5 to February 14 during which period payment was being made. The trip undertaken was at the behest and inured to the benefit of the employer. Payment made to the claimant was not for work rendered nor was it vacation pay due to the claimant. The employer was aware of the severity of claimant’s condition and continued to pay her salary, thereby constituting an advance payment of compensation to toll the application of Section 28.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1128, 404 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-fazio-v-a-torregrosso-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack