Claim of Fayette v. Brush Studio & Art Shop

261 A.D. 1023, 26 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585

This text of 261 A.D. 1023 (Claim of Fayette v. Brush Studio & Art Shop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Fayette v. Brush Studio & Art Shop, 261 A.D. 1023, 26 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

This is an appeal from an award made by the State Industrial Board pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. It is not seriously disputed that claimant became disabled from lead poisoning, an occupational disease. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 3, subd. 2.) The evidence amply supports the finding of the State Industrial Board that claimant contracted lead poisoning in the course of and by reason of his employment. The award should be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Bill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 1023, 26 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-fayette-v-brush-studio-art-shop-nyappdiv-1941.