Claim of Fayette v. Brush Studio & Art Shop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Fayette v. Brush Studio & Art Shop

261 A.D. 1023, 26 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1941·Published

Opinion

This is an appeal from an award made by the State Industrial Board pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. It is not seriously disputed that claimant became disabled from lead poisoning, an occupational disease. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 3, subd. 2.) The evidence amply supports the finding of the State Industrial Board that claimant contracted lead poisoning in the course of and by reason of his employment. The award should be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Bill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from an award made by the State Industrial Board pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. It is not seriously disputed that claimant became disabled from lead poisoning, an occupational disease. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 3, subd. 2.) The evidence amply supports the finding of the State Industrial Board that claimant contracted lead poisoning in the course of and by reason of his employment. The award should be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Bill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Claim of Fayette v. Brush Studio & Art Shop, 261 A.D. 1023, 26 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 1023 (Claim of Fayette v. Brush Studio & Art Shop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.