Claim of Farber v. U. S. Trucking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Farber v. U. S. Trucking Corp.

31 A.D.2d 678, 295 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2627

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 678 (Claim of Farber v. U. S. Trucking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Farber v. U. S. Trucking Corp., 31 A.D.2d 678, 295 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the self-insured employer from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 31, 1967, which held the claimant to be the lawful wife of the deceased employee. It must be noted at the outset that as a result of the procedural patterns of fact finding and legal review, some seven years have passed since the claim was filed and the claimant has not yet received a final determination of her right to benefits under this social legislation. Upon the last appeal to this court (24 A D 2d 1047) we essentially held that the board upon the record before it could find a valid common-law marriage in the State of Florida. The facts are no different in the present record than on the prior appeal and, accordingly, we affirm the factual determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the self-insured employer from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 31, 1967, which held the claimant to be the lawful wife of the deceased employee. It must be noted at the outset that as a result of the procedural patterns of fact finding and legal review, some seven years have passed since the claim was filed and the claimant has not yet received a final determination of her right to benefits under this social legislation. Upon the last appeal to this court (24 A D 2d 1047) we essentially held that the board upon the record before it could find a valid common-law marriage in the State of Florida. The facts are no different in the present record than on the prior appeal and, accordingly, we affirm the factual determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 678, 295 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-farber-v-u-s-trucking-corp-nyappdiv-1968.