Claim of Farber v. Harbor Shoes Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Claim of Farber v. Harbor Shoes Co.

179 N.E.2d 508, 10 N.Y.2d 875

DecidedOctober 19, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 179 N.E.2d 508 (Claim of Farber v. Harbor Shoes Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Farber v. Harbor Shoes Co., 179 N.E.2d 508, 10 N.Y.2d 875 (N.Y. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for a new hearing. The hypothetical question addressed to the physician who testified for this claimant, and on which he based his opinion, included assumptions as to the [877]*877events of February 1, 1957 which, in part, were not based on evidence and, in other respects, were based on uncorroborated hearsay testimony of claimant (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 118). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for a new hearing. The hypothetical question addressed to the physician who testified for this claimant, and on which he based his opinion, included assumptions as to the [877]*877events of February 1, 1957 which, in part, were not based on evidence and, in other respects, were based on uncorroborated hearsay testimony of claimant (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 118). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 N.E.2d 508, 10 N.Y.2d 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-farber-v-harbor-shoes-co-ny-1961.